Race to the Bottom

Dr. Malcolm Cross

Both Democrats and Republicans may believe they have a vested interest in charging each other with “racism,” but the growing use of this epithet is contributing to the debasement of our political discourse.

Going into 2020, Democrats have at least two major problems—their policies, and impeachment.  In the past, I’ve noted that proposals for a Green New Deal, Medicare for All, free college, student loan debt forgiveness, etc., frequently elicit favorable public approval ratings—until the voters begin to learn of the proposed programs’ implications—more spending, higher taxes, bigger government, loss of private insurance, the shift of the burden of repaying student loans from those who borrowed the money to the taxpayers in general, etc., etc., etc.  Democratic presidential candidates may propose these programs to win support among the most hardcore liberals who will vote in the Democratic primaries, but whoever wins the Democratic presidential nomination may then be saddled with a record of supporting programs less popular among those more likely to vote in general elections.

Impeachment, too, is a potential trap for the Democrats.  Should the House fail to impeach the President, the hard core Democratic activists may become more apathetic and less likely to support Democrats running for office.  They won’t become Republicans, of course, but they may stay home or “go fishing” on Election Day, 2020.  But if the House impeaches the President, the GOP-dominated Senate will almost certainly acquit him.  Moreover, the President’s support from his base will no doubt be strengthened by his ordeal, and his re-election chances thereby made easier.

So charging the President with “racism” becomes a way for the Democrats to divert public attention away from their policy proposals while simultaneously downplaying impeachment until they figure out what to do on that score.  Moreover, they may be able to whip up enough enthusiasm among African American and Hispanic voters to boost their turnout and win the election in 2020.

Or maybe not.

President Trump may well be helped in two ways.  First, charges that he’s a racist, based most recently on his attacks on Congressman Elijah Cummings and Cummings’s Maryland congressional district, will likely support and reinforce the determination of President Trump’s base to stand by him in 2020.  As noted in previous columns, the President’s popularity is unusually low for someone presiding over so strong an economy, and the President has failed so far to expand his popularity beyond his hard core white male Christian Conservative supporters.  If he cannot do so in the future, he must therefore arouse his base to turn out in greater numbers than last time.  And nothing arouses his base more than direct attacks on the President, even if—and perhaps especially if—the President provokes those attacks himself.  However much the Democrats may criticize President Trump’s attacks on illegal immigrants, the Squad, or Elijah Cummings and his constituents, the fact remains that what he says and what’s said in response have made no dent in his popularity to date.  Perhaps nothing can.  

Second, it should be kept in mind that while the most vocal charges of racism have been levied against the President, more subtle charges have been levied by Democrats against—other Democrats.  For example, Senator Harris has said—perhaps disingenuously—that she does not believe Joe Biden is a racist.  But she’s attacked him for his opposition to forced busing in the 1970s, as well as for his civility towards the white racists whom the South used to elect to the Senate.  And AOC has criticized Speaker Pelosi for opposing “women of color” in the House of Representatives.  These accusations, however veiled or implied, of racism levied by Democrats against each other will no doubt weaken the Democratic Party to the President’s benefit.  It’s easy to imagine President Trump lapping it all up with profound amusement and satisfaction.

But politics aside, it must be emphasized that the use of “racism” to deflect any criticism debases and renders useless the term as a means of criticism.  To be a “racist” once meant to believe one’s race was superior to others, and that a person’s race—if that race were considered inferior– meant he was irredeemably weak, lazy, greedy, selfish, stupid, or evil.  Yet these days, to charge one with racism is frequently the way to express disagreement with views one dislikes, without having to think about the actual merits of those vies.

Two personal examples:  I’ve occasionally been accused of racism for saying that in college admissions, as well as in the classroom everyone should be held to the same standards, without regard to race, gender, or any other extraneous characteristic—I’m not willing to consider white male privilege or its lack as a factor in admissions or grading.  And some years ago, in response to a speech I gave suggesting the United States should encourage more diversification of economies in the Middle East by promoting free trade and free markets, another professor said my policy prescriptions were “racist” because they implied the superiority of western economic thought to whatever economic theories may currently be popular in the Middle East.  In short, to charge someone with racism, or socialism, or communism, or fascism, or anti-Semitism is the lazy and dishonest way of trying to shut down debate on issues rather than probe for counterarguments’ strengths and weaknesses.

We have over 15 months to go before Election Day, 20/20.  However filthy and depressing we may have considered the 2016 campaign to have been, there’s plenty of time for the 2020 campaign to reach or even exceed the depths of depravity reached four years ago.  To the political junkie, the next 15 months will prove fascinating, but to everyone, junkie or not, they may prove unrelentingly discouraging as well, as everyone throws mud on everyone else, and thereby diminishes the vocabulary with which we can express reasoned opinions.

Malcolm L. Cross has lived in Stephenville and taught politics and government at Tarleton since 1987. His political and civic activities include service on the Stephenville City Council (2000-2014) and on the Erath County Republican Executive Committee (1990 to the present).  He was Mayor Pro Tem of Stephenville from 2008 to 2014.  He is a member of St. Luke’s Episcopal Church and the Stephenville Rotary Club, and does volunteer work for the Boy Scouts of America. Views expressed in this column are his and do not reflect those of The Flash as a whole.

1 Comment

  1. While Trump may be crude and rude, he’s also shrewd. Although he hasn’t come right out and said so, he actually welcomes being called a racist by the Democrats. He intuitively knows that the American people view such attacks as childish, playground-type slurs rather than adult arguments about policy. And, I believe he sits back and purposely congers up ways to make their heads explode. They are as predictable as Old Faithful. But, because they’ve never grown up, they are unable to reason their way to that realization.

    The election of 2016 represented a sea change. Traditional political analysis is, I believe, looking through an obsolete prism that has been completely shattered. Given the completely incorrect predictability of polling to accurately call the 2016 race, it must be recognized that polling methodologies are fundamentally flawed, particularly as they relate to the black and Hispanic communities. In practice, they are fundamentally conservative and very religious. They do not favor abortion on demand and they want their communities rid of criminals.

    For 30 years how, black Conservatives like Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, and Shelby Steele have been identifying such black “leaders” as Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Elijah Cummings as race hustlers and poverty pimps. Young black Conservatives like Candace Owens, Larry Elder, and Brandon Tatum are having a transformative influence on minority voters. They know they have been infantilized by the Democrats for 50 years and they’ve had enough.


    These voters are not walking down the street wearing MAGA hats because they are being vilified by the childish Left. But, they are also not revealing their true political leanings to pollsters. These people will not “stay home” or “go fishing” on election day in 2020. They will walk into the voting booth and quietly vote for Trump. All he need do is “peel off” 5 to 10% of that traditional Democratic voting block to crush whoever ultimately gets the Democratic nomination. They have become part of his “base”.

    If House Democrats impeach Trump, the Senate will not “almost certainly” acquit him. Given that it takes a supermajority in the Senate to actually remove a President from office, any articles of impeachment will be dead on arrival in the Senate. Recall that the Republicans lost BIG after impeaching Bill Clinton. Newt Gingrich was pretty much forced out of office. Nancy Pelosi seems to realize what a hazard the Democrats are facing. But, the radical children in her Party are so blinded by their hatred of Trump that they seem to be willing to dash over that cliff. Some of them, like AOC and the Squad are too young to have lived through Clinton’s administration. But, Nadler, Shiff, and Cummings are old enough to remember.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.